The Workspace Suite Vision: Google Workspace for Agent-Human Teams
The Workspace Suite Vision: Google Workspace for Agent-Human Teams
Section titled “The Workspace Suite Vision: Google Workspace for Agent-Human Teams”The Big Bet (Revised)
Section titled “The Big Bet (Revised)”Google Workspace gives humans mail + drive + docs + sheets. 3 billion people use it. $37B+ annually.
But Google Workspace was built for humans collaborating with humans. The next generation of workplace collaboration includes AI agents as teammates — not just tools that summarize a doc, but full participants that produce work, share files, and respond to feedback.
We’re building Google Workspace for agent-human teams.
The Portfolio
Section titled “The Portfolio”| Primitive | Product | Human Analogy | Agent-Human Collaboration? | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mailmolt (mailmolt.com) | Gmail | Agents send/receive, humans monitor | Beta | |
| Skill discovery | Findable (findable.sh) | App Store + npm | Shared trust layer | Pre-launch |
| Collaborative workspace | Agent Workspace (TBD) | Google Drive | Full collaboration | Research |
| Documents | Future | Google Docs | Agents draft, humans edit | Vision |
| Spreadsheets | Future | Google Sheets | Agents populate, humans analyze | Vision |
Why a Collaborative Suite Wins
Section titled “Why a Collaborative Suite Wins”1. Unified Agent + Human Identity
Section titled “1. Unified Agent + Human Identity”The killer feature: one identity for each agent, one account for each human, all sharing the same workspace.
Today: An agent needs separate credentials for email, storage, tools. A human manages multiple dashboards, multiple audit trails.
With the suite:
Organization: Company Inc.├── Humans│ ├── rakesh@company.com (admin)│ └── priya@company.com (reviewer)├── Agents│ ├── agent-content (Mailmolt + Workspace + Findable)│ ├── agent-analytics (Workspace + Findable)│ └── agent-social (Mailmolt + Workspace)├── Shared Workspaces│ └── /campaigns/q1-launch/ (all agents + all humans)└── One audit trail, one permission model, one bill2. Cross-Primitive Collaborative Workflows
Section titled “2. Cross-Primitive Collaborative Workflows”Example: Agent-Human Campaign Workflow
- Human drops
brief.mdto shared workspace - Content agent detects new file (webhook), reads brief
- Content agent writes
draft-v1.mdto workspace - Human gets notification, opens dashboard, reviews draft
- Human adds comment: “Tone is too formal, make it conversational”
- Content agent reads comment via
vault_feedback, revises →draft-v2.md - Analytics agent reads campaign data, writes
metrics.json - Human reviews final version, moves to
/final/ - Social agent picks up final content, adapts for channels
- Complete audit trail: who did what, when, why
This workflow is impossible with any existing tool. Google Drive doesn’t have agent identity. Fast.io doesn’t have human collaboration. MCP wrappers don’t have shared workspaces.
3. Switching Costs & Lock-In
Section titled “3. Switching Costs & Lock-In”- Data gravity: Files in workspace, emails in Mailmolt, skills in Findable
- Identity lock-in: One agent identity tied to multiple services
- Workflow dependencies: Cross-service automations break if you switch
- Human adoption: Once humans learn the dashboard, switching is painful
Revenue Model
Section titled “Revenue Model”Individual Products
Section titled “Individual Products”| Product | Pricing |
|---|---|
| Mailmolt | $5/agent/month |
| Findable | Freemium + enterprise governance |
| Agent Workspace | $5-30/month (tiered by collaborators) |
Suite Bundle
Section titled “Suite Bundle”| Tier | Price | Includes |
|---|---|---|
| Starter | $12/month | Mail + Workspace (3 agents, 2 humans) |
| Team | $25/month | Mail + Workspace + Skills (5 agents, 5 humans) |
| Enterprise | Custom | Everything + compliance + SLA + SSO |
Revenue Projection (Conservative)
Section titled “Revenue Projection (Conservative)”| Year | Products Live | Paying Orgs | Revenue |
|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | Mailmolt + Findable | 500 | $200K ARR |
| Year 2 | + Workspace | 2,000 | $1.5M ARR |
| Year 3 | + Suite bundle | 5,000 | $8M ARR |
| Year 5 | Full suite | 15,000 | $50M ARR |
The Risk: Why This Might Not Work
Section titled “The Risk: Why This Might Not Work”1. Humans Don’t Want to Work in “Agent Workspace”
Section titled “1. Humans Don’t Want to Work in “Agent Workspace””Humans are accustomed to Google Drive, Dropbox, Notion. Asking them to work in a new tool — even if it’s better for agent collaboration — faces adoption resistance.
Counter: The dashboard should feel like Google Drive, not a developer tool. Familiar UX is critical. The agents do the work; humans just need to view, comment, and approve.
2. “Good Enough” Wrappers + Incumbents
Section titled “2. “Good Enough” Wrappers + Incumbents”Google/Microsoft add agent features to existing tools. For most enterprises, “agents in Google Drive” may be sufficient.
Counter: Agents-in-Drive treats agents as tools. Agents-in-Workspace treats agents as teammates. Different paradigm. The 20% of enterprises doing serious multi-agent deployment will need purpose-built collaboration.
3. Three Products at Once
Section titled “3. Three Products at Once”Sequential execution mitigates this. Win one primitive, use traction to raise for the next.
4. Gartner: 40% of Agentic AI Projects Will Be Canceled by 2027
Section titled “4. Gartner: 40% of Agentic AI Projects Will Be Canceled by 2027”Market may shrink. But infrastructure companies survive application-layer shakeouts.
What Success Looks Like (5 Years)
Section titled “What Success Looks Like (5 Years)”- 15,000+ paying organizations with both agents and humans on the platform
- $50M+ ARR from suite subscriptions
- “The default workspace for agent-human teams” — brand recognition in the category
- Human users love the dashboard — NPS > 50 for the human experience
- Ecosystem: Third-party integrations built on the platform